Data Access Governance Platform
Launching soon
Know Who or What Can Access Your Data.
Data Access Governance with Zero Trust Enforcement
DAGZEN gives enterprises visibility and control over every data access path — across humans, applications, workloads, and AI agents — while enforcing policy at the point of access.
Access path
- HumanAlice
- delegates toAI AgentFinance Agent
- invokesMCP ToolCustomer Tool
- accessesApplicationFinance Service
Zero Trust Enforcement
- Verify
- Evaluate
- Authorize
- Enforce
- connectsDatabaseCustomer Database
- containsSensitive Datacustomer.ssn
Access decision
READ
customer.ssn
ALLOWED
- Policy
- Finance-PII-Read
- Policy Version
- 42
- Principal
- Finance Agent
- Delegated By
- Alice
- Purpose
- Financial Analysis
- Access Channel
- MCP
Governance, right now
- 2,604
- Identities governed
- 1.2M
- Access decisions / 24h
- 247
- Data stores governed
- 8,412
- Sensitive columns
Decisions · last 24h
- Allowed1,184,203
- Denied61,427
- Requires review12,884
Example data — figures shown for illustration
Overview
Every Data Access Request Must Earn Trust.
Traditional access models begin with an identity and a permission. DAGZEN extends that model by evaluating the complete data access context — who is requesting access, what is being accessed, how the request reached the data, why access is needed, and whether policy allows it.
- WHOHuman / Application / Workload / AI Agent
- HOWApplication / API / Tool / MCP / Delegation
- WHEREDatabase / Object / Warehouse / Lake / Dataset
- WHATSensitive Data / PII / Financial / Customer Data
- WHYPurpose / Context / Task
- POLICYIdentity + Attributes + Relationships + Context
- ZERO TRUST ENFORCEMENTVerify · Evaluate · Authorize · Enforce
- DECISIONAllow / Deny / Review
- PROOFAudit · Analytics · Governance Coverage
Insights
The Answers, Not Just the Data.
Identity & access answers who can reach the data and whether that is still justified. Data security posture answers what the data is and how exposed it is. Two sets of answers over one estate — not two products to reconcile.
Identities governed
2,604
humans, apps, workloads, agents
Access decisions / 24h
1.2M
median 0.4 ms at the access point
Policies in force
1,840
bundle version 412
Privileged identities
94
3.6% of all principals
Access decisions · last 24h
- Allowed
- 1,184,203
- Denied
- 61,427
- Requires review
- 12,884
Principals under governance
Dormancy & unused access
the cheapest privilege to remove- Dormant identitiesno access in 90 days213 / 2,604
- Unused entitlementsgranted, never exercised1,487 / 9,240
- Stale credentialspast rotation window38 / 612
- Over-provisionedreach exceeds actual use176 / 2,604
Access reviews in flight
- Q3 privileged access reviewSecurity · due in 6 days78%
- Finance data entitlementsData governance · due in 12 days41%
- Agent purpose bindingsPlatform · due in 2 days92%
Findings requiring review
- CriticalOut-of-band grant on crm-prod-01ops_break_glass holds DELETE on customer.ssn — declared by no policy.
- HighOver-provisioned service identitysvc-reporting can read 14 restricted columns it has never queried.
- HighAgent access without purpose binding3 agents reached PII without a declared purpose in the last 7 days.
- MediumDelegation chain depth 4analytics-agent → tool → app → workload → warehouse.
Example data — figures shown for illustration
The gap
A Permission Is Three Nodes. A Real Access Path Is Eleven.
Every permissions list and entitlement report answers the same three questions: who, what allowed, what resource. Everything that gets an enterprise into trouble happens in the eight steps in between.
- 01Principal
Who is asking
≙ Identity
- 02Relationship
Groups, roles, nested membership
- 03Application
What they are asking through
- 04Workload
Batch job, service, pipeline
- 05Agent / Tool
Delegated, purpose-bound
- 06Access path
Direct, inherited, transitive
- 07Policy
What is allowed
≙ Permission
- 08Data resource
Store, table, column
≙ Resource
- 09Effective access
What they can really reach
- 10Observed activity
What they actually did
- 11Zero Trust decision
Allow, deny, review
A single real request
A permissions list shows you the first box and the last. DAGZEN governs every step between them — and tells you when a step exists that no policy ever declared.
The lifecycle
Every Database, Governed From the Moment It Exists.
From the instant a database is created, through onboarding and classification, to every access decision and the insights your team reviews — one continuous lifecycle, not a set of disconnected tools.
A database comes into existence
Someone provisions a Postgres instance, restores a backup into staging, or spins up a warehouse. It holds real data from the first minute.
- Any cloud
- Any engine
- Including the ones nobody filed a ticket for
Where this sits
Zero Trust Enforcement
Zero Trust Enforcement at the Data Access Point
DAGZEN does not assume an authenticated identity should automatically be trusted. Every governed data access request is evaluated against the applicable policy and context before access is allowed.
Never trust automatically
Authentication is not authorization. Being signed in is the start of the question, not the answer.
Verify every access
Each governed request is evaluated against the policy that applies to it, every time.
Least privilege
Grant only the access the task requires, for only as long as it requires it.
Context-aware
Identity, application, workload, agent, purpose, resource and classification all inform the decision.
Enforce locally
Decisions are made next to the application and the data, not across a network hop.
Continuous visibility
Record and analyse access as it actually happens, not only as it was intended.
Capabilities
One Governance Layer for Every Data Access Path
The same model covers a person querying a table, a nightly pipeline, a service account behind a connection pool, and an agent calling a tool over MCP.
Data Discovery
Finds the data estate as it actually is, including the stores nobody registered.
- Databases
- NoSQL stores
- Object storage
- Data warehouses
- Data lakes
- Lakehouses
- Analytics platforms
- Data APIs
Six ways access arrives
Only the first is visible in a permissions list. The rest are why declared access and effective access disagree.
- Direct
- The principal holds the grant on the resource itself.
- Indirect
- Access arrives through an application or a workload in between.
- Delegated
- One principal acts on behalf of another, with scope that may only narrow.
- Inherited
- Access comes from a group, a role or a nested membership.
- Transitive
- A chain of relationships leads to the data, several hops away.
- Observed
- The engine reports access the platform never declared.
Access graph
Everything That Can Reach One Column.
Pick a data asset and DAGZEN shows every route to it — inherited through groups, delegated to an agent, granted directly, or sitting in the engine with no policy behind it at all.
Observed access
Ungoverned- Effective access
- SELECT INSERT UPDATE DELETE TRUNCATE
- Declared by
- no policy
- Superuser
- yes
- Found by
- Reading the engine's own grants
- Finding
- Out-of-band grant — no review covered it
A permissions list shows one of these four routes. An entitlement report shows three. The fourth is only found by reading the engine’s own grants and comparing them against policy.
AI agents
AI Agents Are Part of the Data Access Path
DAGZEN extends Data Access Governance to AI agents, delegated access, tools, MCP, applications and agent-to-data paths. An agent is another kind of principal in the same model — not a separate product.
Delegation chain
- Human
- delegatesAI Agent
- invokesTool / MCP
- accessesApplication
- connectsData
What every agent access carries
If the originating principal is unknown, that is recorded as a gap — never left blank.
- Agent identity
- Delegated by
- Purpose
- Task
- Tool
- Application
- Workload
- Data resource
- Action
- Policy
- Decision
Understand the agent’s effective data access — not just its direct permissions.
Policy
Policies That Understand Identity, Relationships, and Context
A rule is written once, in the terms the business already uses, and carries everything the decision depends on — including how the request got there.
When
- Principal
- Finance Agent
- Delegated by
- Finance User
- Resource
- Customer PII
- Action
- READ
- Purpose
- Financial Analysis
- Access channel
- MCP
- Relationship
- Agent → Tool → Application → Database
Then
ALLOW
What the decision draws on
- Identity
- Attributes
- Relationships
- Roles
- Delegation
- Context
- Data classification
- Purpose
- Access path
ABAC + ReBAC + Identity / Role context
DAGZEN is not limited to a single authorization model. Attributes, relationships and role context are evaluated together, because real access questions need all three.
Data estate
Govern Data Access Across Your Data Estate.
One policy model across every cloud and the racks you still run yourself. 77+ store types, each governed by the same rules — because an estate split across four providers is exactly where per-platform tooling stops being able to answer anything.
Relational
- RDS for PostgreSQL
- RDS for MySQL
- RDS for Oracle
- RDS for SQL Server
- Aurora PostgreSQL
- Aurora MySQL
NoSQL
- DynamoDB
- DocumentDB
- Neptune
- Keyspaces
- MemoryDB
Analytics
- Redshift
- Athena
- EMR
- OpenSearch
- Glue Catalog
Object storage
- S3
- S3 Glacier
- EFS
Security design
Built Around Zero Trust Principles
The properties the platform is designed to hold. These are engineering principles, not certifications — DAGZEN makes no compliance or certification claims.
- Verify explicitly
- Least privilege
- Assume breach
- Context-aware authorization
- Local enforcement
- Policy versioning
- Signed policy distribution
- Tenant isolation
- Auditability
- Defense in depth
Launching soon · early access open
See Who Can Reach Your Data — Today.
DAGZEN governs every path to enterprise data, for humans, applications, workloads and AI agents, with Zero Trust Enforcement at the point of access. Book a walkthrough against your own estate.
Request a Demo
Tell us about your estate and we will walk you through DAGZEN against it.